BSA · Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023
Section 27 — Relevancy of certain evidence for proving, in subsequent proceeding, truth of facts therein stated.
Replaces Evidence Act Section 33.
Evidence given by a witness in a judicial proceeding, or before any person authorised by law to take it, is relevant for the purpose of proving, in a subsequent judicial proceeding, or in a later stage of the same judicial proceeding, the truth of the facts which it states, when the witness is dead or cannot be found, or is incapable of giving evidence, or is kept out of the way by the adverse party, or if his presence cannot be obtained without an amount of delay or expense which, under the circumstances of the case, the Court considers unreasonable: Provided that the proceeding was between the same parties or their representatives in interest; that the adverse party in the first proceeding had the right and opportunity to cross-examine and the questions in issue were substantially the same in the first as in the second proceeding. Explanation. --A criminal trial or inquiry shall be deemed to be a proceeding between the prosecutor and the accused within the meaning of this section.
Nearby sections
- 24 Consideration of proved confession affecting person making it and others jointly under trial for same offence.
- 25 Admissions not conclusive proof, but may estop.
- 26 Cases in which statement of relevant fact by person who is dead or cannot be found, etc., is relevant.
- 28 Entries in books of account when relevant.
- 29 Relevancy of entry in public record or an electronic record made in performance of duty.
- 30 Relevancy of statements in maps, charts and plans.
Official data, Open data · as of 2026-07-05 · every row this page summarises carries its source, capture date and licence through the API.